Filed: Jun. 18, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-20837 Conference Calender UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DEBORAH HOFFMAN, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR H-96-39-2 - - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1997 Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Deborah Hoffman has filed a brief as required by Anders v. Californi
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-20837 Conference Calender UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DEBORAH HOFFMAN, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR H-96-39-2 - - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1997 Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Deborah Hoffman has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-20837
Conference Calender
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DEBORAH HOFFMAN,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. CR H-96-39-2
- - - - - - - - - -
June 17, 1997
Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Deborah Hoffman has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the brief, Hoffman’s response, and the
record discloses no nonfrivolous issues. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No.
- 2 -
