Filed: Mar. 30, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-31305 Summary Calendar WISTING FIERRO RUIZ ET AL., Plaintiffs, WISTING FIERRO RUIZ; JAIRO FERNANDO RIASCOS; Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus JANET RENO, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL., Defendants, JANET RENO, U.S. Attorney General; KEITH HALL, Warden; RITA A. STANLEY; R. KEVIN MCHUGH; NANCY A. HOOKS; U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, DIRECTOR; UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appea
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-31305 Summary Calendar WISTING FIERRO RUIZ ET AL., Plaintiffs, WISTING FIERRO RUIZ; JAIRO FERNANDO RIASCOS; Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus JANET RENO, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL., Defendants, JANET RENO, U.S. Attorney General; KEITH HALL, Warden; RITA A. STANLEY; R. KEVIN MCHUGH; NANCY A. HOOKS; U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, DIRECTOR; UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-31305
Summary Calendar
WISTING FIERRO RUIZ ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,
WISTING FIERRO RUIZ; JAIRO FERNANDO RIASCOS;
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
versus
JANET RENO, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.,
Defendants,
JANET RENO, U.S. Attorney General;
KEITH HALL, Warden; RITA A. STANLEY;
R. KEVIN MCHUGH; NANCY A. HOOKS;
U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, DIRECTOR;
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 95-CV-191
- - - - - - - - - -
March 24, 1998
Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Wisting Fierro Ruiz (federal prisoner No. 59534-079) and
Jairo Fernando Riascos (federal prisoner No. 05062-003) appeal
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 96-31305
-2-
the dismissal of their complaint seeking monetary damages for
alleged civil rights violations arising out of deportation
proceedings initiated by the Attorney General. We affirm on the
alternative basis that the district court lacked subject-matter
jurisdiction to review appellants’ claim. See 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252(g).
AFFIRMED.