Filed: Apr. 15, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-50906 Conference Calendar BENNIE FINISTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus THON WILEY NICHOLS, Guard of Texas Department of Criminal Justice; ET AL., Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-95-CV-345 - - - - - - - - - - - April 8, 1998 Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The motion filed by Bennie Finister, Texas stat
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-50906 Conference Calendar BENNIE FINISTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus THON WILEY NICHOLS, Guard of Texas Department of Criminal Justice; ET AL., Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-95-CV-345 - - - - - - - - - - - April 8, 1998 Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The motion filed by Bennie Finister, Texas state..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-50906
Conference Calendar
BENNIE FINISTER,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
THON WILEY NICHOLS, Guard of
Texas Department of Criminal
Justice; ET AL.,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. W-95-CV-345
- - - - - - - - - - -
April 8, 1998
Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The motion filed by Bennie Finister, Texas state prisoner
#649506, for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is
DENIED. Finister has failed to identify a nonfrivolous issue for
appeal. The district court did not err in certifying that an
appeal would be frivolous. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED
as frivolous. See Howard v. King,
707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.
1983); Baugh v. Taylor,
117 F.3d 197, 202 n.24 (5th Cir. 1997);
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
O R D E R
No. 96-50906
- 2 -
5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Finister that any additional
frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the
imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Finister is further
cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do
not raise arguments that are frivolous.
IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING
ISSUED.