Filed: Apr. 15, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-40916 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN ANTONIO BARRON-REVILLA, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-97-CR-62-1 - - - - - - - - - - April 10, 1998 Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Juan Antonio Barron-Revilla appeals his sentence following a guilty plea for reentry af
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-40916 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN ANTONIO BARRON-REVILLA, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-97-CR-62-1 - - - - - - - - - - April 10, 1998 Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Juan Antonio Barron-Revilla appeals his sentence following a guilty plea for reentry aft..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-40916
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JUAN ANTONIO BARRON-REVILLA,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. L-97-CR-62-1
- - - - - - - - - -
April 10, 1998
Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Juan Antonio Barron-Revilla appeals his sentence following a
guilty plea for reentry after deportation in violation of
8 U.S.C. § 1326. Barron-Revilla argues that he was charged with
and pleaded guilty to simple reentry following deportation under
§ 1326(a) and that he could not be sentenced under § 1326(b)
because the indictment did not allege that he had a prior
aggravated-felony conviction. His argument is foreclosed by the
Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States,
___ U.S. ___,
1998 WL 126904, at *3, *8 (U.S. Mar. 24, 1998).
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 97-40916
-2-
AFFIRMED.