Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Caicedo, 97-50286 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 97-50286 Visitors: 65
Filed: Apr. 15, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-50286 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, VERSUS EDISON SANCHEZ CAICEDO, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (A-96-CV-011) April 8, 1998 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Edison Sanchez Caicedo appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate, set aside , or correct his sentence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2
More
                        UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                                    No. 97-50286
                                  Summary Calendar


                           UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee,


                                          VERSUS


                              EDISON SANCHEZ CAICEDO,

                                                             Defendant-Appellant.



                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Western District of Texas
                                      (A-96-CV-011)


                                      April 8, 1998
Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Edison Sanchez Caicedo appeals the district court’s denial of

his motion to vacate, set aside , or correct his sentence, pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.             Caicedo contends that the district court

erred       in   finding   he    had    not   demonstrated        that   he   received

ineffective assistance of counsel and in refusing to order an

evidentiary hearing prior to denying his motion. Caicedo also

argues      that   he   was     not    required    to   obtain    a   Certificate   of

        *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Appealability

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer