Filed: Apr. 15, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-50674 Summary Calendar MARY J. VILLARREAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-94-CV-689 - - - - - - - - - - April 14, 1998 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Mary J. Villarreal appeals from the district court’s decision in favor
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-50674 Summary Calendar MARY J. VILLARREAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-94-CV-689 - - - - - - - - - - April 14, 1998 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Mary J. Villarreal appeals from the district court’s decision in favor ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-50674
Summary Calendar
MARY J. VILLARREAL,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
KENNETH S. APFEL,
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. A-94-CV-689
- - - - - - - - - -
April 14, 1998
Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Mary J. Villarreal appeals from the district court’s
decision in favor of the Commissioner which denied child’s
insurance benefits based on disability and Supplemental Security
Income benefits to Villarreal. Villarreal argues that she did
not validly waive her right to counsel at the administrative
level; that she did not receive a full and fair administrative
hearing; and that the Commissioner’s decision is not supported by
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 97-50674
-2-
substantial evidence because the Commissioner failed to apply the
correct legal standards.
We lack jurisdiction to review Villarreal’s arguments
concerning her lack of legal representation and the adequacy of
her hearing before the Administrative Law Judge because
Villarreal did not raise those issues on administrative appeal.
Paul v. Shalala,
29 F.3d 208, 210 (5th Cir. 1994); 20 C.F.R.
§ 404.900(b). We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the
parties and find no error in the district court’s determination
that substantial evidence supports the Commissioner’s
determination that Villarreal is not disabled.
AFFIRMED.