Filed: Apr. 15, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-51064 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN ANTONIO CAMPOS-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-97-CR-421-ALL - - - - - - - - - - April 8, 1998 Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Juan Antonio Campos-Gonzalez appeals his sentence for reentry after deportation in v
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-51064 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN ANTONIO CAMPOS-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-97-CR-421-ALL - - - - - - - - - - April 8, 1998 Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Juan Antonio Campos-Gonzalez appeals his sentence for reentry after deportation in vi..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-51064
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JUAN ANTONIO CAMPOS-GONZALEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. EP-97-CR-421-ALL
- - - - - - - - - -
April 8, 1998
Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Juan Antonio Campos-Gonzalez appeals his sentence for
reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Campos-Gonzalez argues that he was charged with and pleaded
guilty to simple reentry under § 1326(a) and that he could not be
sentenced under § 1326(b) because the indictment did not allege
that he had a prior aggravated felony conviction. His argument
is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-
Torres v. United States, ___ U.S. ___,
1998 WL 126904, at *3, *8
(U.S. Mar. 24, 1998).
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No.
-2-
AFFIRMED.