Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Juatassa Sims v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 98-60126 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 98-60126 Visitors: 25
Filed: Nov. 06, 1998
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 200 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 1998) JUATASSA SIMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 98-60126 Summary Calendar IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALs, FIFTH CIRCUIT November 6, 1998 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi, Neal B. Jr., Chief Judge. Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 Juatassa Sims appeals the district court's affirmance of the Commissio
More

200 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 1998)

JUATASSA SIMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 98-60126
Summary Calendar

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALs, FIFTH CIRCUIT

November 6, 1998

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi, Neal B. Jr., Chief Judge.

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Juatassa Sims appeals the district court's affirmance of the Commissioner's denial of her application for disability insurance benefits, contending that the administrative law judge: (1) failed to afford proper weight to a psychologist's opinion that she was severely depressed; (2) improperly excluded certain of her impairments in assessing her residual function capacity; and (3) should have ordered a consultative examination to assess her mental impairments. We affirm.

2

We lack jurisdiction to review Sims's second and third contentions because they were not raised before the Appeals Council.1 The first contention is without merit because the ALJ is entitled and expected to determine the credibility of medical experts and to weigh their opinions accordingly.2 Concluding that the findings of the ALJ are supported by substantial evidence, the judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.3

Notes:

1

Paul v. Shalala, 29 F.3d 208 (5th Cir. 1994).

2

Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d 232 (5th Cir. 1994).

3

Villa v. Sullivan, 895 F.2d 1019 (5th Cir. 1990).

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer