Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

97-10685 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 97-10685 Visitors: 26
Filed: Feb. 26, 1999
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 169 F.3d 215 79 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1770 , 75 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,754 Julie Deffenbaugh WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellee Cross-Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al., Defendants, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Defendant-Appellant Cross-Appellee. No. 97-10685. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Feb. 26, 1999. Mark C. Brodeur, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee Cross-Appellant. Jimmy Preston Wrotenbery, Kevin D. Jewell, Magenheim, Bateman, Robinson, Wrotenbery & Helfand, Houston, TX
More

169 F.3d 215

79 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1770,
75 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,754
Julie Deffenbaugh WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellee Cross-Appellant,
v.
WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al., Defendants,
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Defendant-Appellant Cross-Appellee.

No. 97-10685.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 26, 1999.

Mark C. Brodeur, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee Cross-Appellant.

Jimmy Preston Wrotenbery, Kevin D. Jewell, Magenheim, Bateman, Robinson, Wrotenbery & Helfand, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant Cross-Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Eldon B. Mahon, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion Sept. 24, 1998, 5 Cir., 1998, 156 F.3d 581).

Before POLITZ, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.*

BY THE COURT:

1

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

2

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

*

Chief Judge King is recused and did not participate in this decision

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer