Filed: Oct. 20, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-60840 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GUS ALLEN, JR., also known as Sealed Defendant 1, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:94-CR-91-ALL-B-N - October 19, 1999 Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The district court permitted Gus Allen, Jr., to file this out-of-time appeal from his
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-60840 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GUS ALLEN, JR., also known as Sealed Defendant 1, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:94-CR-91-ALL-B-N - October 19, 1999 Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The district court permitted Gus Allen, Jr., to file this out-of-time appeal from his ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-60840
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GUS ALLEN, JR., also known
as Sealed Defendant 1,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 3:94-CR-91-ALL-B-N
--------------------
October 19, 1999
Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The district court permitted Gus Allen, Jr., to file this
out-of-time appeal from his 1995 conviction and sentence, after a
jury trial, for distribution of cocaine base (in violation of 21
U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)).
For the first time on appeal, Allen contends that the
district court erred in applying the Sentencing Guidelines’
enhanced penalty provisions for cocaine base because the
Government allegedly failed to prove by a preponderance of the
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 97-60840
-2-
evidence that the substance involved was “crack” cocaine.
See U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c), note (D) (definition of “cocaine base”
means “crack”). Because trial testimony by both a confidential
informant and an undercover drug-enforcement agent showed that
the substance involved was “crack” cocaine, the evidence was more
than sufficient to warrant enhanced sentencing. See United
States v. Canada,
110 F.3d 260, 262 (5th Cir. 1997) (Government
must prove sentencing factors by a preponderance of the
evidence). Accordingly, Allen’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.