Filed: Aug. 27, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-11303 Conference Calendar ARNELL TOLIVER, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus HERMAN SHAFFER; HUBE JEAN-LOUIS, Defendants-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:97-CV-260-C - August 24, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Arnell Toliver, Texas prisoner # 644452, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the defen
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-11303 Conference Calendar ARNELL TOLIVER, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus HERMAN SHAFFER; HUBE JEAN-LOUIS, Defendants-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:97-CV-260-C - August 24, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Arnell Toliver, Texas prisoner # 644452, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the defend..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-11303
Conference Calendar
ARNELL TOLIVER,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
HERMAN SHAFFER; HUBE JEAN-LOUIS,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:97-CV-260-C
--------------------
August 24, 1999
Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Arnell Toliver, Texas prisoner # 644452, appeals the
district court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendants in
this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. His motion to file a reply brief
out of time is DENIED. Toliver has not adequately briefed any
argument relating to the district court’s grant of summary
judgment. See Grant v. Cuellar,
59 F.3d 523, 524 (5th Cir.
1995); Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner,
813 F.2d
744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 98-11303
-2-
Toliver’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous.
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. The
dismissal of this appeal as frivolous counts as a “strike” for
purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). We caution Toliver that once he
accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed in forma pauperis
(IFP) in any civil action or appeal filed while he is
incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under
imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(g).
MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; WARNING ISSUED.