Filed: Sep. 14, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-11492 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CESAR JAVIER SOLIZ, also known as El Artista, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:97-CR-409-P-17 - September 13, 1999 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender, court-appointed counsel for Cesar Soliz, has filed a motion to wit
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-11492 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CESAR JAVIER SOLIZ, also known as El Artista, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:97-CR-409-P-17 - September 13, 1999 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender, court-appointed counsel for Cesar Soliz, has filed a motion to with..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-11492
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CESAR JAVIER SOLIZ, also known as El Artista,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:97-CR-409-P-17
--------------------
September 13, 1999
Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender, court-appointed counsel for
Cesar Soliz, has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief as
required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Soliz has
not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and
the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel
is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal
is dismissed.
MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
