Filed: Aug. 27, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-11500 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE JAVIER DAVILA-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:98-CR-25-1 - August 24, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Javier Davila-Martinez has moved for leave to with
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-11500 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE JAVIER DAVILA-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:98-CR-25-1 - August 24, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Javier Davila-Martinez has moved for leave to withd..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-11500
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE JAVIER DAVILA-MARTINEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:98-CR-25-1
--------------------
August 24, 1999
Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose
Javier Davila-Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has
filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Davila-Martinez has filed a response. Our independent
review of the brief, the record, and Davila-Martinez’s response
discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No.
-2-
is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL
IS DISMISSED.