Filed: Aug. 30, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-11511 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KENNETH JONES, also known as Jap, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:98-CR-082-P-1 - August 27, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender, court-appointed appellate counsel for Kenneth Jones, has moved for le
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-11511 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KENNETH JONES, also known as Jap, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:98-CR-082-P-1 - August 27, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender, court-appointed appellate counsel for Kenneth Jones, has moved for lea..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-11511
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
KENNETH JONES, also known as Jap,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:98-CR-082-P-1
--------------------
August 27, 1999
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender, court-appointed appellate
counsel for Kenneth Jones, has moved for leave to withdraw and
has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S.
738 (1967). Jones has responded to the motion by filing a brief
wherein he contends that there are nonfrivolous grounds for
appeal. Our independent review of the briefs and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No.
-2-
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.