Filed: Jul. 09, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-20688 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KELVIN WAYNE ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-97-CR-275-1 - June 30, 1999 Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Kelvin Wayne Robinson has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-20688 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KELVIN WAYNE ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-97-CR-275-1 - June 30, 1999 Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Kelvin Wayne Robinson has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-20688
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
KELVIN WAYNE ROBINSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
---------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-97-CR-275-1
---------------------
June 30, 1999
Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Kelvin Wayne Robinson has filed
a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Robinson has moved this court
to dismiss court-appointed counsel and to appoint a new attorney
for appeal. Robinson’s motion for appointment of substitute
counsel is DENIED. Our review of the brief filed by counsel and
of the record discloses no nonfrivolous point for appeal.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel
is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.