Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Powell, 98-20873 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 98-20873 Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 25, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-20873 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DOROTHY POWELL, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-97-CR-168-12 - - - - - - - - - - August 25, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Dorothy Powell has moved for leave to withdraw and ha
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 98-20873
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DOROTHY POWELL,

                                              Defendant-Appellant.

                         - - - - - - - - - -
            Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Southern District of Texas
                       USDC No. H-97-CR-168-12
                         - - - - - - - - - -

                            August 25, 1999

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Court-appointed counsel for Dorothy Powell has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Powell has not filed a

response.   Our independent review of the brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.        See 
id. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED.


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No.
-2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer