Filed: Jul. 01, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-30670 Summary Calendar ALICE E. GUILLORY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 97-CV-1425 - - - - - - - - - - July 1, 1999 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Alice Guillory appeals the district court’s judgment for the Commis
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-30670 Summary Calendar ALICE E. GUILLORY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 97-CV-1425 - - - - - - - - - - July 1, 1999 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Alice Guillory appeals the district court’s judgment for the Commiss..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-30670
Summary Calendar
ALICE E. GUILLORY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
KENNETH S. APFEL,
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 97-CV-1425
- - - - - - - - - -
July 1, 1999
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Alice Guillory appeals the district court’s judgment for the
Commissioner in her action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for
review of the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) decision denying
her request for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental
Security Income. We review the Commissioner’s decision to
determine whether the decision is supported by substantial evidence
in the record and whether the Commissioner applied the proper legal
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 98-30670
-2-
standards in evaluating the evidence. Villa v. Sullivan,
895 F.2d
1019, 1021 (5th Cir. 1990).
Guillory makes the following contentions: (1) the ALJ failed
to evaluate her impairments in the aggregate; (2) the Appeals
Council should have remanded the case in light of new and material
evidence; and (3) the magistrate judge improperly engaged in de
novo review of the new evidence when he found it “cumulative.” We
have reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, and we find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment entered by
the district court. See Guillory v. Apfel, No. 97-1425 (W.D. La.
May 19, 1998).
AFFIRMED.