Filed: Jun. 16, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-40858 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE LEOCADIO NIETO-ZAPATA, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-98-CR-80-1 - - - - - - - - - - June 15, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Leocadio Nieto-Zapata
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-40858 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE LEOCADIO NIETO-ZAPATA, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-98-CR-80-1 - - - - - - - - - - June 15, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Leocadio Nieto-Zapata ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-40858
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE LEOCADIO NIETO-ZAPATA,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. B-98-CR-80-1
- - - - - - - - - -
June 15, 1999
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Leocadio
Nieto-Zapata has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 744
(1967). Although given notice, Nieto has filed no response to
the motion to dismiss. We have independently reviewed counsel’s
brief and the record and have found no nonfrivolous issues.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No.
-2-
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.