Filed: Jun. 17, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-41012 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTONIO JARAMILLO-TAVARES, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 5:98-CR-2-1 - - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Antonio Jaramillo-Tavares has moved for leave to
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-41012 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTONIO JARAMILLO-TAVARES, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 5:98-CR-2-1 - - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Antonio Jaramillo-Tavares has moved for leave to ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-41012
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANTONIO JARAMILLO-TAVARES,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:98-CR-2-1
- - - - - - - - - -
June 17, 1999
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Antonio Jaramillo-Tavares has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Jaramillo-Tavares has
filed a response in which he raises, among other issues,
ineffective assistance of counsel. The record has not been
adequately developed for us to consider Jaramillo-Tavares’s
argument on direct appeal. See United States v. Haese,
162 F.3d
359, 363-64 (5th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, ___ S. Ct. ___, 1999
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 98-41012
-2-
WL 241837 (U.S., May 24, 1999). Our independent review of the
brief, the record, and Jaramillo-Tavares’s response discloses no
nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.