Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Jaramillo-Tavares, 98-41012 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 98-41012 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 17, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-41012 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTONIO JARAMILLO-TAVARES, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 5:98-CR-2-1 - - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Antonio Jaramillo-Tavares has moved for leave to
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 98-41012
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                             Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTONIO JARAMILLO-TAVARES,

                                             Defendant-Appellant.

                        - - - - - - - - - -
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Eastern District of Texas
                       USDC No. 5:98-CR-2-1
                        - - - - - - - - - -

                             June 17, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Court-appointed counsel for Antonio Jaramillo-Tavares has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).      Jaramillo-Tavares has

filed a response in which he raises, among other issues,

ineffective assistance of counsel.    The record has not been

adequately developed for us to consider Jaramillo-Tavares’s

argument on direct appeal.     See United States v. Haese, 
162 F.3d 359
, 363-64 (5th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, ___ S. Ct. ___, 1999


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 98-41012
                                -2-

WL 241837 (U.S., May 24, 1999).   Our independent review of the

brief, the record, and Jaramillo-Tavares’s response discloses no

nonfrivolous issue.   Accordingly, the motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer