Filed: Aug. 30, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-41091 Conference Calendar RONALD J. HOLLEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus WAYNE SCOTT; MILTON BROCK, Assistant Warden; ALFRED JANICEK, Field Major; LLOYD J. ASCHBERGER, Physician Assistant, Estelle Regional Medical Facility; JAMES WARREN, Captain, Defendants-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9:96-CV-32 - August 27, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVI
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-41091 Conference Calendar RONALD J. HOLLEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus WAYNE SCOTT; MILTON BROCK, Assistant Warden; ALFRED JANICEK, Field Major; LLOYD J. ASCHBERGER, Physician Assistant, Estelle Regional Medical Facility; JAMES WARREN, Captain, Defendants-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9:96-CV-32 - August 27, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-41091
Conference Calendar
RONALD J. HOLLEMAN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
WAYNE SCOTT; MILTON BROCK,
Assistant Warden; ALFRED JANICEK,
Field Major; LLOYD J. ASCHBERGER,
Physician Assistant, Estelle
Regional Medical Facility;
JAMES WARREN, Captain,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 9:96-CV-32
--------------------
August 27, 1999
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Ronald J. Holleman, Texas prisoner No. 297567, appeals the
district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 prisoner civil
rights claim after remand; the case was dismissed for lack of
exhaustion. Holleman’s outstanding motions are DENIED AS MOOT.
This court, if necessary, must sua sponte examine the basis of
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 98-41091
-2-
its jurisdiction. Williams v. Chater,
87 F.3d 702, 704 (5th Cir.
1996); Mosley v. Cozby,
813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). The
only notice of appeal filed by Holleman was filed prior to final
judgment and prior to the announcement of a final decision. Such
premature notice is insufficient to invoke appellate
jurisdiction. See FirsTier Mortgage Co. v. Investors Mortgage
Ins. Co.,
498 U.S. 269, 252-53 (1991); United States v. Cooper,
135 F.3d 960, 963 (5th Cir. 1998).
APPEAL DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION; ALL OUTSTANDING
MOTIONS DENIED AS MOOT.