Filed: Jun. 16, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-41139 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALFREDO ANTONIO IRUGAS-MACIEL, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-98-CR-327-1 - - - - - - - - - - June 15, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alfredo Antonio Ir
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-41139 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALFREDO ANTONIO IRUGAS-MACIEL, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-98-CR-327-1 - - - - - - - - - - June 15, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alfredo Antonio Iru..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-41139
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ALFREDO ANTONIO IRUGAS-MACIEL,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. B-98-CR-327-1
- - - - - - - - - -
June 15, 1999
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alfredo
Antonio Iruegas-Maciel has moved for leave to withdraw and has
filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967). Iruegas-Maciel has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
