Filed: Dec. 16, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-41141 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANDRES LOPES-FLORIANO, also known as Ramiro Garcia-Lopez, also known as Arturo Lopez-Lopez, also known as Nieves Lopez-Sepeda, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-98-CR-189-01 - December 15, 1999 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appellan
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-41141 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANDRES LOPES-FLORIANO, also known as Ramiro Garcia-Lopez, also known as Arturo Lopez-Lopez, also known as Nieves Lopez-Sepeda, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-98-CR-189-01 - December 15, 1999 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appellant..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-41141
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANDRES LOPES-FLORIANO, also known as Ramiro
Garcia-Lopez, also known as Arturo Lopez-Lopez,
also known as Nieves Lopez-Sepeda,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. M-98-CR-189-01
--------------------
December 15, 1999
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellant, Andres Lopes-Floriano, pleaded guilty to illegal
reentry into the United States. He was previously deported
following a conviction for illegally transporting aliens. At
sentencing, the district court increased his base offense level
pursuant to U.S.S.G. ยง 2L1.2(b)(1)(A), which provides for a
sixteen-level increase in the case of a prior deportation
following an aggravated felony conviction.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 98-41141
-2-
Lopes contends on appeal, as he did in the district court,
that transporting aliens within the United States does not
constitute an aggravated felony for purposes of the sixteen-level
enhancement. However, our court recently rejected this same
argument in United States v. Monjaras-Castaneda,
190 F.3d 326,
330 (5th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the
district court.
AFFIRMED.