Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Aguirre-Joya, 98-50872 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 98-50872 Visitors: 67
Filed: May 24, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-50872 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PEDRO AGUIRRE-JOYA, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-97-CR-1019-ALL-H - - - - - - - - - - May 20, 1999 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The court-appointed attorney for Pedro Aguirre-Joya (“Aguirre”) has filed a motion to
More
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 98-50872
                          Summary Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                           Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PEDRO AGUIRRE-JOYA,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.
                        - - - - - - - - - -
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Texas
                   USDC No. EP-97-CR-1019-ALL-H
                        - - - - - - - - - -

                            May 20, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The court-appointed attorney for Pedro Aguirre-Joya

(“Aguirre”) has filed a motion to withdraw from representation of

Aguirre and a brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Aguirre has filed no response to his attorney’s

motion and brief.   Our independent review of the brief and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.      Accordingly, Aguirre’s

court-appointed attorney’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED; the

attorney is excused from further responsibilities herein and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED.


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer