Filed: Dec. 03, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-60152 Summary Calendar DONALD WAYNE WILLIS, Petitioner-Appellant, versus STATE OF MISSISSIPPI; MIKE MOORE, Attorney General, State of Mississippi, Respondents-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 2:97-CV-292-P-G - December 3, 1999 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Donald Wayne Willis (Mississippi prisoner # 40317-A) was granted a
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-60152 Summary Calendar DONALD WAYNE WILLIS, Petitioner-Appellant, versus STATE OF MISSISSIPPI; MIKE MOORE, Attorney General, State of Mississippi, Respondents-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 2:97-CV-292-P-G - December 3, 1999 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Donald Wayne Willis (Mississippi prisoner # 40317-A) was granted a ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-60152
Summary Calendar
DONALD WAYNE WILLIS,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI;
MIKE MOORE, Attorney General,
State of Mississippi,
Respondents-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 2:97-CV-292-P-G
--------------------
December 3, 1999
Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Donald Wayne Willis (Mississippi prisoner # 40317-A) was
granted a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the
district court’s dismissal of his habeas corpus petition as time-
barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)’s statute of limitations. Both
parties were ordered to brief the limitations issue; however,
Willis has not done so.
“Although [this court] liberally construe[s] the briefs of
pro se appellants, [this court] also require[s] that arguments
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 98-60152
-2-
must be briefed to be preserved.” Yohey v. Collins,
985 F.2d
222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993)(internal quotation and citation
omitted). Willis has neither briefed nor identified any error in
the dismissal of his petition as time-barred. Accordingly, the
judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
AFFIRMED.