Filed: Dec. 16, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-10448 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RONALD COOKS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:98-CR-8-1 - December 16, 1999 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ronald Cooks has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as req
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-10448 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RONALD COOKS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:98-CR-8-1 - December 16, 1999 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ronald Cooks has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as requ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-10448
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RONALD COOKS,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:98-CR-8-1
--------------------
December 16, 1999
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ronald
Cooks has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as
required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Cooks has
not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and
the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel
is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL
IS DISMISSED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
