Filed: Dec. 29, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-10895 Summary Calendar RONALD DARNELL WORDLAW, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus JIM BOWLES, Sheriff; BILL LITTLE, Deputy Sheriff; GEORGE W. BUSH, Governor; BOYD PATTERSON, Judge; NO FIRST INITIAL McMILLIAN, Deputy Chief, Defendants-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:99-CV-1098-H - December 20, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-10895 Summary Calendar RONALD DARNELL WORDLAW, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus JIM BOWLES, Sheriff; BILL LITTLE, Deputy Sheriff; GEORGE W. BUSH, Governor; BOYD PATTERSON, Judge; NO FIRST INITIAL McMILLIAN, Deputy Chief, Defendants-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:99-CV-1098-H - December 20, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER C..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-10895
Summary Calendar
RONALD DARNELL WORDLAW,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
JIM BOWLES, Sheriff; BILL LITTLE, Deputy
Sheriff; GEORGE W. BUSH, Governor; BOYD
PATTERSON, Judge; NO FIRST INITIAL
McMILLIAN, Deputy Chief,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:99-CV-1098-H
--------------------
December 20, 1999
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Ronald Darnell Wordlaw, Arizona prisoner # 58949, appeals
the district court’s dismissal as frivolous of his civil rights
complaint against various officials in Texas and, by amendment,
various officials in Arizona. Wordlaw alleged that his
extradition from Texas to Arizona was improper, and he makes
similar arguments on appeal.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 99-10895
-2-
Wordlaw has not shown that the district court abused its
discretion in dismissing the complaint as frivolous. See Berry
v. Brady, ___ F.3d ___,
1999 WL 803637, *2 (5th Cir. Oct. 8,
1999).
AFFIRMED.