Filed: Oct. 14, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-20327 Summary Calendar ELIZABETH ANN HOPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS INTERNATIONAL HOUSE OF PANCAKES; MOHAMMAD AMIN, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (H-98-CV-1381) October 6, 1999 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* In May 1998, Elizabeth Ann Hopson (Hopson) filed suit against International House of Pancakes and Mohammad Amin (Am
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-20327 Summary Calendar ELIZABETH ANN HOPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS INTERNATIONAL HOUSE OF PANCAKES; MOHAMMAD AMIN, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (H-98-CV-1381) October 6, 1999 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* In May 1998, Elizabeth Ann Hopson (Hopson) filed suit against International House of Pancakes and Mohammad Amin (Ami..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-20327
Summary Calendar
ELIZABETH ANN HOPSON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
INTERNATIONAL HOUSE OF PANCAKES; MOHAMMAD AMIN,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
(H-98-CV-1381)
October 6, 1999
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
In May 1998, Elizabeth Ann Hopson (Hopson) filed suit against
International House of Pancakes and Mohammad Amin (Amin) alleging
discrimination in employment on the grounds of gender in violation
of Title VII, 46 U.S.C. § 2000(e), et seq. and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983
and 1991. The International House of Pancakes was dismissed from
this suit in August 1998 by agreement of the parties. In November
1998, defendant Amin filed his motion for summary judgment. In
November 1998, the parties agreed to trial by the magistrate judge.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
In January 1999, the magistrate judge granted Amin’s motion for
summary judgment. Hopson brings this appeal.
We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts and
relevant portions of the record itself. For the reasons stated by
the magistrate judge in her Memorandum and Order filed February 1,
1999, we affirm the Final Judgment entered on February 1, 1999,
which dismissed all of Hopson’s claims against Amin on the merits.
AFFIRMED.
2