Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Bryant, 99-30026 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 99-30026 Visitors: 19
Filed: Aug. 26, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-30026 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GEORGE HENRY BRYANT, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 98-CR-20098-1 - - - - - - - - - - August 25, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent George Henry Bryant has
More
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                              No. 99-30026
                          Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GEORGE HENRY BRYANT,

                                              Defendant-Appellant.

                          - - - - - - - - - -
            Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Louisiana
                        USDC No. 98-CR-20098-1
                          - - - - - - - - - -

                            August 25, 1999

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent George

Henry Bryant has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Bryant has not filed a

response.   Our independent review of the brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion

to withdraw is GRANTED.    Counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.        See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer