Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ndatah v. Casterline, 99-30658 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 99-30658 Visitors: 27
Filed: Dec. 20, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-30658 Conference Calendar IBBI SAM NDATAH, Petitioner-Appellant, versus FRAN McGLOTHLAS; JANET RENO, U.S. Attorney General; CARL CASTERLINE, Respondents-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 98-CV-2165 - December 17, 1999 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Ibbi Sam Ndatah, federal prisoner #26846-077, moves for waiver of the re
More
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT


                             No. 99-30658
                          Conference Calendar


IBBI SAM NDATAH,

                                              Petitioner-Appellant,
versus

FRAN McGLOTHLAS; JANET RENO, U.S.
Attorney General; CARL CASTERLINE,

                                              Respondents-Appellees.

                          --------------------
             Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Western District of Louisiana
                           USDC No. 98-CV-2165
                          --------------------
                            December 17, 1999

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Ibbi Sam Ndatah, federal prisoner #26846-077, moves for

waiver of the requirement that he file a brief in his appeal.

Ndatah’s motion is GRANTED.    The district court lacked

jurisdiction to consider Ndatah’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenge to a

detainer allegedly placed against him by the Immigration and

Naturalization Service.    8 U.S.C. § 1252(g).     Ndatah’s appeal is

frivolous.

     APPEAL DISMISSED.    5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer