Filed: Dec. 20, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-30658 Conference Calendar IBBI SAM NDATAH, Petitioner-Appellant, versus FRAN McGLOTHLAS; JANET RENO, U.S. Attorney General; CARL CASTERLINE, Respondents-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 98-CV-2165 - December 17, 1999 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Ibbi Sam Ndatah, federal prisoner #26846-077, moves for waiver of the re
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-30658 Conference Calendar IBBI SAM NDATAH, Petitioner-Appellant, versus FRAN McGLOTHLAS; JANET RENO, U.S. Attorney General; CARL CASTERLINE, Respondents-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 98-CV-2165 - December 17, 1999 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Ibbi Sam Ndatah, federal prisoner #26846-077, moves for waiver of the req..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-30658
Conference Calendar
IBBI SAM NDATAH,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
FRAN McGLOTHLAS; JANET RENO, U.S.
Attorney General; CARL CASTERLINE,
Respondents-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 98-CV-2165
--------------------
December 17, 1999
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Ibbi Sam Ndatah, federal prisoner #26846-077, moves for
waiver of the requirement that he file a brief in his appeal.
Ndatah’s motion is GRANTED. The district court lacked
jurisdiction to consider Ndatah’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenge to a
detainer allegedly placed against him by the Immigration and
Naturalization Service. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g). Ndatah’s appeal is
frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.