Filed: Dec. 29, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-30760 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ABDUL JEROME HAYES, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 99-CR-60001-1 - - - - - - - - - - December 22, 1999 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Abdul Jerome Hayes appeals his conditional guilty-plea conviction of possession of a f
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-30760 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ABDUL JEROME HAYES, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 99-CR-60001-1 - - - - - - - - - - December 22, 1999 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Abdul Jerome Hayes appeals his conditional guilty-plea conviction of possession of a fi..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-30760
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ABDUL JEROME HAYES,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 99-CR-60001-1
- - - - - - - - - -
December 22, 1999
Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Abdul Jerome Hayes appeals his conditional guilty-plea
conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon, a violation of
18 U.S.C. § 922(g). Hayes argues that the district court erred
in denying his motion to suppress the firearm that police
officers seized from his bag, as he did not consent to speak with
the officers.
The district court did not clearly err in rejecting Hayes’
testimony in favor of that of the officers who testified at the
suppression hearing. See United States v. Chavez-Villarreal, 3
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 99-30760
-2-
F.3d 124, 126 (5th Cir. 1993); United States v. Garza,
118 F.3d
278, 283 (5th Cir. 1997) (this court will not second-guess
district court’s credibility determinations), cert. denied,
118
S. Ct. 699 (1998). The district court also did not err in
holding that the defendant freely and voluntarily consented to
the search of his bag. See United States v. Kelley,
981 F.2d
1464, 1470 (5th Cir. 1993) (voluntary consent can validate
warrantless search).
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.