Filed: Aug. 27, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-40116 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARIA GUADALUPE CORTEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-97-CR-57-1 - August 26, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Maria Guadalupe Cortez has moved for leave to withdraw and h
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-40116 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARIA GUADALUPE CORTEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-97-CR-57-1 - August 26, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Maria Guadalupe Cortez has moved for leave to withdraw and ha..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-40116
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARIA GUADALUPE CORTEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. C-97-CR-57-1
--------------------
August 26, 1999
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Maria
Guadalupe Cortez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Cortez has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but she
has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief
and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No.
-2-
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED.