Filed: Dec. 16, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-40231 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOAQUIN BATRES-ORTEGA, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-98-CR-551-ALL - - - - - - - - - - December 15, 1999 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Joaquin Batres-Ortega (B
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-40231 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOAQUIN BATRES-ORTEGA, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-98-CR-551-ALL - - - - - - - - - - December 15, 1999 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Joaquin Batres-Ortega (Ba..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-40231
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOAQUIN BATRES-ORTEGA,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. B-98-CR-551-ALL
- - - - - - - - - -
December 15, 1999
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Joaquin
Batres-Ortega (Batres) has requested leave to withdraw as counsel
and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386
U.S. 738 (1967). Batres has received a copy of counsel’s motion
and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review
of the brief and record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.
Accordingly counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No.
-2-
is DISMISSED.