Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Resa, 99-40371 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 99-40371 Visitors: 21
Filed: Nov. 30, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-40371 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARTIN RESA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-98-CR-532-1 - November 24, 1999 Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:1 The Federal Public Defender, court-appointed counsel for Martin Resa, has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
More
                   IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                                  No. 99-40371
                                Summary Calendar



                         UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                      versus

                                  MARTIN RESA,

                                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                         --------------------
             Appeal from the United States District Court
                  for the Southern District of Texas
                        USDC No. B-98-CR-532-1
                         --------------------

                               November 24, 1999

Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

      The    Federal   Public    Defender,      court-appointed    counsel    for

Martin Resa, has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738
   (1967),    and    Resa   has    filed   a   response.     Our

independent     review    of    the    briefs      and   record   discloses   no

nonfrivolous issue.      Accordingly, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the appeal is dismissed.

      MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.




      1
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer