Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Salais-Velazquez, 99-50162 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 99-50162 Visitors: 9
Filed: Sep. 13, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-50162 Summary Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CRISPIN SALAIS-VELAZQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (EP-98-CR-1121-ALL-H) _ September 8, 1999 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Crispin Salais-Velazquez moves to withdraw as appellate counsel and
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                        __________________

                           No. 99-50162
                         Summary Calendar
                        __________________


     UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                       Plaintiff-Appellee,

                              versus

     CRISPIN SALAIS-VELAZQUEZ,

                                       Defendant-Appellant.

          ______________________________________________

           Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Western District of Texas
                       (EP-98-CR-1121-ALL-H)
          ______________________________________________

                         September 8, 1999

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Crispin

Salais-Velazquez moves to withdraw as appellate counsel and has

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Counsel addresses only the sentence adjudged against

Salais.   Salais was convicted on a guilty plea of illegal reentry

following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. section 1326.    He

has not filed a response.

     Salais directed his counsel to appeal only his sentence.   Our


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
independent    review    of   the   brief    and    the   record   discloses   no

nonfrivolous    issue.        Accordingly,    the    motion   to   withdraw    is

GRANTED; counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein;

and the appeal is DISMISSED.         5TH CIR. R. 42.2.



                                            MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED




                                       2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer