Filed: Nov. 09, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-60214 Summary Calendar TREVETTE VASSER, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS WAL-MART STORES, INC, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi (1:97-CV-380-B-A) November 3, 1999 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Plaintiff-appellant Trevette Vasser appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant- appellant. Vasser a
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-60214 Summary Calendar TREVETTE VASSER, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS WAL-MART STORES, INC, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi (1:97-CV-380-B-A) November 3, 1999 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Plaintiff-appellant Trevette Vasser appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant- appellant. Vasser ar..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-60214 Summary Calendar TREVETTE VASSER, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS WAL-MART STORES, INC, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi (1:97-CV-380-B-A) November 3, 1999 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Plaintiff-appellant Trevette Vasser appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant- appellant. Vasser argues on appeal that she sufficiently raised genuine issues of material fact in order to survive a motion for summary judgment on her claims of racial and sexual discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended by the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 28 U.S.C. section 2000 et. seq. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Having reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record, we AFFIRM for essentially the same reasons articulated by the district court.
