Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Sosa v. Johnson, 00-10571 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 00-10571 Visitors: 11
Filed: Dec. 15, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-10571 Conference Calendar THOMAS SOSA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus NFN JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:99-CV-393 - December 13, 2000 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Thomas Sosa (TDCJ # 668562) has, on at least three prior occasions, filed in forma pauperis (IFP) complaints that have been dismissed as frivolous
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 00-10571
                        Conference Calendar



THOMAS SOSA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

NFN JOHNSON,

                                         Defendant-Appellee.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                      USDC No. 2:99-CV-393
                      --------------------
                        December 13, 2000

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Thomas Sosa (TDCJ # 668562) has, on at least three prior

occasions, filed in forma pauperis (IFP) complaints that have

been dismissed as frivolous or for failure to state a claim.      See

Sosa v. Doe, No. 99-41101 (5th Cir. Mar. 16, 2000).    Sosa is thus

BARRED from proceeding IFP in any civil action or appeal filed

while he is in prison unless he is under imminent danger of

serious physical injury.   See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).    Sosa has

failed to establish any such danger.



     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 00-10571
                                -2-

     Therefore, Sosa’s leave to proceed IFP on appeal is

DECERTIFIED.   The appeal is DISMISSED.   Sosa may seek to

reinstate the appeal by paying the full appellate filing fee of

$105 to the clerk of the district court within 15 days of the

date of this opinion.

     IFP DECERTIFIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; THREE-STRIKES BAR

IMPOSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer