Filed: Dec. 15, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-20137 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus REYMUNDO MUÑOZ, also known as Little Ray, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-176-7 - December 14, 2000 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* David Adler, court-appointed counsel for Reymundo Muñoz, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-20137 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus REYMUNDO MUÑOZ, also known as Little Ray, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-176-7 - December 14, 2000 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* David Adler, court-appointed counsel for Reymundo Muñoz, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-20137
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
REYMUNDO MUÑOZ, also known as
Little Ray,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-99-CR-176-7
--------------------
December 14, 2000
Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
David Adler, court-appointed counsel for Reymundo Muñoz, has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Muñoz has filed no
response. Our independent review of the brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous appellate issue. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.