Filed: Aug. 31, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-30110 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHESTER CHERAMIE, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 93-CR-229-ALL-J USDC No. 97-CV-1164 - August 28, 2000 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Chester Cheramie, federal prisoner # 17581-034, appeals the district court’s denial of hi
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-30110 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHESTER CHERAMIE, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 93-CR-229-ALL-J USDC No. 97-CV-1164 - August 28, 2000 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Chester Cheramie, federal prisoner # 17581-034, appeals the district court’s denial of his..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-30110
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CHESTER CHERAMIE,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
USDC No. 93-CR-229-ALL-J
USDC No. 97-CV-1164
--------------------
August 28, 2000
Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Chester Cheramie, federal prisoner # 17581-034, appeals the
district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of error coram
nobis. Cheramie argues that at resentencing, the district court
erroneously used his prior conspiracy convictions to enhance his
sentence in conflict with this court’s decision on direct appeal.
Cheramie is not entitled to coram nobis relief because he is
still in custody. See United States v. Castro,
26 F.3d 557, 559
(5th Cir. 1994). Further, Cheramie could have raised this issue
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 00-30110
-2-
in a direct appeal after resentencing, but failed to do so. The
writ of coram nobis may not be used as a substitute for appeal.
See United States v. Dyer,
136 F.3d 417, 422 (5th Cir. 1998).
Motion for COA DENIED as MOOT. AFFIRMED.