Filed: Dec. 15, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-30712 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL NELSON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 93-CR-55-1-A - December 13, 2000 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Michael Nelson, federal prisoner #02461-095, requests a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal from the district court’s
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-30712 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL NELSON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 93-CR-55-1-A - December 13, 2000 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Michael Nelson, federal prisoner #02461-095, requests a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal from the district court’s ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-30712
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL NELSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
USDC No. 93-CR-55-1-A
--------------------
December 13, 2000
Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Michael Nelson, federal prisoner #02461-095, requests a
certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal from the district
court’s denial of his petition for writ of coram nobis pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 1651. Nelson’s request for a COA is DENIED AS
UNNECESSARY. See United States v. Dyer,
136 F.3d 417, 429 n.32
(5th Cir. 1998)
“The writ of coram nobis is an extraordinary remedy
available to a petitioner no longer in custody who seeks to
vacate a criminal conviction in circumstances where the
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 00-30712
-2-
petitioner can demonstrate civil disabilities as a consequence of
the conviction, and that the challenged error is of sufficient
magnitude to justify the extraordinary relief.” Jimenez v.
Trominski,
91 F.3d 767, 768 (5th Cir. 1996). Because Nelson is
still in custody, he is not entitled to coram nobis relief. His
appeal is therefore DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. See Howard v. King,
707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
COA DENIED AS UNNECESSARY; APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS.