Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Miller, 00-40092 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 00-40092 Visitors: 31
Filed: Dec. 01, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-40092 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. WILLIAM LARRY MILLER, JR. Defendant - Appellant - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:99-CR-16-ALL - December 1, 2000 Before KING, Chief Judge, and SMITH and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent William Larry Miller, Jr. has moved for leave to withdraw and
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                             No. 00-40092
                           Summary Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                Plaintiff - Appellee

     v.

WILLIAM LARRY MILLER, JR.

                Defendant - Appellant

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Eastern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 1:99-CR-16-ALL
                       --------------------
                         December 1, 2000

Before KING, Chief Judge, and SMITH and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent William

Larry Miller, Jr. has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).

Miller has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has

not filed a response.    Our independent review of the brief and

the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.    See 
id. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer