Filed: Dec. 13, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-40259 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TROY DONAVAN BOUNDS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. V-94-CR-1-2 - December 13, 2000 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Troy Bounds, federal prisoner # 66117-079, seeks to appeal the district court’s dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of various
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-40259 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TROY DONAVAN BOUNDS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. V-94-CR-1-2 - December 13, 2000 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Troy Bounds, federal prisoner # 66117-079, seeks to appeal the district court’s dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of various ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-40259
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TROY DONAVAN BOUNDS,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. V-94-CR-1-2
--------------------
December 13, 2000
Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Troy Bounds, federal prisoner # 66117-079, seeks to appeal
the district court’s dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of
various post-conviction motions. The “Notice of Appeal” that
Bounds filed in the district court on March 10, 2000, does not
meet the requirements of FED. R. APP. P. 3(c) and, thus, fails to
confer jurisdiction on this court. United States v. Truesdale,
211 F.3d 898, 902-03 (5th Cir. 2000); United States v. Cooper,
135 F.3d 960, 961-62 (5th Cir. 1998). Bounds has not identified,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 00-40259
-2-
and our review of the record does not reveal, any other document
that would support the existence of appellate jurisdiction.
Consequently, the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.