Filed: Nov. 28, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-50147 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROSALBA DOMINGUEZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-99-CR-165-ALL-FB - - - - - - - - - - November 27, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Rosalba Dominguez-Hernandez, who was convicted of possession with in
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-50147 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROSALBA DOMINGUEZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-99-CR-165-ALL-FB - - - - - - - - - - November 27, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Rosalba Dominguez-Hernandez, who was convicted of possession with int..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-50147
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROSALBA DOMINGUEZ-HERNANDEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. P-99-CR-165-ALL-FB
- - - - - - - - - -
November 27, 2000
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Rosalba Dominguez-Hernandez, who was convicted of possession
with intent to distribute marijuana, appeals the district court’s
denial of her motion to suppress her confession. She argues that
the language and tactics used by Border Patrol Agent Nick
Harrison amounted to coercion, which rendered her confession
involuntary.
We have reviewed the record and under the totality of
circumstances, we hold that the district court did not err in
holding the confession to be voluntary. United States v. Mullin,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 00-50147
-2-
178 F.3d 334, 341 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,
120 S. Ct. 454
(1999). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.