Filed: Jul. 20, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 99-31245 CHEVRON CHEMICAL COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, VERSUS OIL, CHEMICAL AND ATOMIC WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, Local 4-447, Defendant-Appellant _ OIL, CHEMICAL AND ATOMIC WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION; ET AL., Plaintiffs, VERSUS CHEVRON CHEMICAL COMPANY; Etc; ET AL., Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana 98-CV-2372-B July 17, 2000 Before DAVIS, JONES and STEWART, Circuit
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 99-31245 CHEVRON CHEMICAL COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, VERSUS OIL, CHEMICAL AND ATOMIC WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, Local 4-447, Defendant-Appellant _ OIL, CHEMICAL AND ATOMIC WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION; ET AL., Plaintiffs, VERSUS CHEVRON CHEMICAL COMPANY; Etc; ET AL., Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana 98-CV-2372-B July 17, 2000 Before DAVIS, JONES and STEWART, Circuit J..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit
No. 99-31245
CHEVRON CHEMICAL COMPANY,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
VERSUS
OIL, CHEMICAL AND ATOMIC WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO,
Local 4-447,
Defendant-Appellant
___________________________________________________________________
OIL, CHEMICAL AND ATOMIC WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION; ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,
VERSUS
CHEVRON CHEMICAL COMPANY; Etc; ET AL.,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Eastern District of Louisiana
98-CV-2372-B
July 17, 2000
Before DAVIS, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The judgment of the district court is affirmed essentially for
the reasons stated in the district court’s November 4, 1999 Order
and Reasons. This case is controlled by International Union of
Operating Engineers, Local 351 v. Cooper Natural Resources, Inc.,
163 F.3d 916 (5th Cir. 1989).
AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
2