Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Perez, 99-10613 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 99-10613 Visitors: 15
Filed: Feb. 17, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-10613 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTHONY PASTOR PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:98-CR-100-1-Y - February 17, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Anthony Perez (“Perez”) appeals the sentence following his guilty-plea conviction for bank robbery, 18 U.S.C
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 99-10613
                        Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY PASTOR PEREZ,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Northern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 4:98-CR-100-1-Y
                       --------------------
                         February 17, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Anthony Perez (“Perez”) appeals the sentence following his

guilty-plea conviction for bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a).    He

argues that the district court erred in increasing his base

offense level five levels, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(2)(C),

for possessing a firearm during the bank robbery.

     We have carefully reviewed the arguments and the appellate

record.   Perez has failed to demonstrate that the district court

clearly erred in its finding that he possessed a firearm during




     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
the bank robbery.   See United States v. McCarty, 
36 F.3d 1349
,

1360 (5th Cir. 1994).

     AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer