Filed: Feb. 16, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: No. 99-10975 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-10975 Conference Calendar CHARLES LEIGH BERKLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ROTAN, Ballinger, Texas, Defendant-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:99-CV-45-C - February 16, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Charles Leigh Berkley, Texas prisoner # 809353, appeals the district co
Summary: No. 99-10975 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-10975 Conference Calendar CHARLES LEIGH BERKLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ROTAN, Ballinger, Texas, Defendant-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:99-CV-45-C - February 16, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Charles Leigh Berkley, Texas prisoner # 809353, appeals the district cou..
More
No. 99-10975
-1-
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-10975
Conference Calendar
CHARLES LEIGH BERKLEY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ROTAN, Ballinger, Texas,
Defendant-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:99-CV-45-C
--------------------
February 16, 2000
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Charles Leigh Berkley, Texas prisoner # 809353, appeals the
district court’s dismissal of his civil lawsuit alleging wrongful
foreclosure and failure to properly service bank accounts.
However, he briefs no argument that the district court erred in
its conclusion; he has thus waived the sole ground for appeal,
and his appeal is DISMISSED. See Yohey v. Collins,
985 F.2d 222,
224-25 (5th Cir. 1993)(arguments must be briefed in order to be
preserved for appeal); Fed. R. App. P. 28(A)(9)(A); Howard v.
King,
707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 99-10975
-2-
Berkley also moves for the appointment of counsel and “to
proceed.” His motions are DENIED.
APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS DENIED.