Filed: Feb. 16, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: No. 99-20011 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-20011 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DANNY WAYNE BELL, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CR-266-1 - - - - - - - - - - February 16, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Danny Wayne Bell seeks to appeal his sentence of 46 months’ i
Summary: No. 99-20011 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-20011 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DANNY WAYNE BELL, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CR-266-1 - - - - - - - - - - February 16, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Danny Wayne Bell seeks to appeal his sentence of 46 months’ im..
More
No. 99-20011
-1-
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-20011
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DANNY WAYNE BELL,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-98-CR-266-1
- - - - - - - - - -
February 16, 2000
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Danny Wayne Bell seeks to appeal his sentence of 46 months’
imprisonment after pleading guilty to being a felon in possession
of a firearm. Bell waived his right to appeal his sentence in
his plea agreement, except in limited circumstances. See United
States v. Melancon,
972 F.2d 566, 568 (5th Cir. 1992). Such
circumstances are not implicated by the current appeal. Bell’s
reliance on United States v. Goodman,
165 F.3d 169 (2nd Cir.),
cert. denied,
120 S. Ct. 318 (1999) is unavailing because Goodman
is not controlling and is distinguishable.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 99-20011
-2-
The appeal is thus DISMISSED.
APPEAL DISMISSED.