Filed: Feb. 11, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-20432 _ HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 66, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas H-98-CV-1902 _ February 10, 2000 Before BARKSDALE, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges: PER CURIAM:* AFFIRMED for essentially the reasons stated in the well-reasoned opinion by the district c
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-20432 _ HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 66, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas H-98-CV-1902 _ February 10, 2000 Before BARKSDALE, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges: PER CURIAM:* AFFIRMED for essentially the reasons stated in the well-reasoned opinion by the district co..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
______________________
No. 99-20432
______________________
HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF
ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 66,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
H-98-CV-1902
________________________________________________________________________
February 10, 2000
Before BARKSDALE, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges:
PER CURIAM:*
AFFIRMED for essentially the reasons stated in the well-reasoned opinion by the
district court. Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. International Bhd. of Elec. Workers,
Local Union No. 66, No. H-98-1902 (S.D. Tex. April 12, 1999). See Houston Lighting &
Power Co. v. International Bhd. of Elec. Workers, Local Union No. 66,
71 F.3d 179 (5th
Cir. 1995).
AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.