Filed: Nov. 01, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-31253 Summary Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALEX HAMILTON, JR., Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana (94-CR-89-ALL-A) _ October 30, 2000 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This appeal concerns revocation of supervised release. Counsel for Alex Hamilton, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-31253 Summary Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALEX HAMILTON, JR., Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana (94-CR-89-ALL-A) _ October 30, 2000 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This appeal concerns revocation of supervised release. Counsel for Alex Hamilton, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has ..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 99-31253
Summary Calendar
_____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ALEX HAMILTON, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Louisiana
(94-CR-89-ALL-A)
_________________________________________________________________
October 30, 2000
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
This appeal concerns revocation of supervised release.
Counsel for Alex Hamilton, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and
has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
[
87 S. Ct. 1396] (1967). Although notified of his right to file a
response, Hamilton has not done so.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses
no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. See
id. Accordingly, counsel’s
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.