Filed: Mar. 24, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: No. 99-40136 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-40136 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ERNESTO URIBE-DELEON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-96-CR-251-1 - March 23, 2000 Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Ernesto Uribe-DeLeon appeals his conditional guilty-plea conviction for possession with the intent to distr
Summary: No. 99-40136 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-40136 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ERNESTO URIBE-DELEON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-96-CR-251-1 - March 23, 2000 Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Ernesto Uribe-DeLeon appeals his conditional guilty-plea conviction for possession with the intent to distri..
More
No. 99-40136
-1-
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-40136
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ERNESTO URIBE-DELEON,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. B-96-CR-251-1
--------------------
March 23, 2000
Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Ernesto Uribe-DeLeon appeals his conditional guilty-plea
conviction for possession with the intent to distribute
marijuana. He argues that his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy
trial was infringed by the 24-month delay between his indictment
and his arrest. Our review of the record and the briefs on
appeal reveals that the district court did not err in its
conclusion that Uribe-DeLeon’s Sixth Amendment right to a speedy
trial was not infringed. See Robinson v. Whitley,
2 F.3d 562,
568-71 (5th Cir. 1993). The judgment of the district court is
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 99-40136
-2-
AFFIRMED.