Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Perez-De Angel, 99-40337 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 99-40337 Visitors: 29
Filed: Jan. 12, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-40337 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LORENZO PEREZ-DE ANGEL, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-98-CR-788-1 - January 4, 2000 Before DAVIS, DUHÉ and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:1 Defendant-Appellant Lorenzo Perez-De Angel (Perez) appeals his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation pursu
More
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                              No. 99-40337
                            Summary Calendar


                       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                             Plaintiff-Appellee,
                                  versus

                        LORENZO PEREZ-DE ANGEL,

                                             Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. L-98-CR-788-1
                      --------------------
                         January 4, 2000

Before DAVIS, DUHÉ and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

     Defendant-Appellant Lorenzo Perez-De Angel (Perez) appeals his

guilty-plea    conviction   for   illegal   reentry   after   deportation

pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2).            Perez alleges his

underlying deportation proceeding violated his Fifth Amendment

right to due process.

     We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties.

Based upon United States v. Benitez-Villafuerte, 
186 F.3d 651
(5th

Cir. 1999), a decision which stands on all fours with this case, we

conclude that Perez’s original deportation proceeding did not

violate due process.    Further, Perez has failed to show that he was

prejudiced by any of the alleged deficiencies in the § 1228

proceeding.    
Id. at 658-59.
     AFFIRMED.


     1
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer